The Documentary Record of Türkiye and Its Regions
Irrecord

Treaties, archives and primary sources, read in full.

Treaties, Archives & International LawEastern Mediterranean & Blue HomelandSecurity & Counter-Terrorism RegisterDiplomacy & Mediation WatchGeopolitical ExplainersFact Check
Editorial Principles· editorial principles primary source standards

Editorial Principles: How Irrecord Handles Sources, Positions and Corrections

Irrecord's editorial principles and primary source standards: how we separate fact from official position, rank sources, use terminology, publish corrections.

I
Published:
⏱ 10 min read (2,174 words)

Why It Matters

Irrecord's editorial principles are the rules that govern how every page on this site is researched, written and corrected. Facts and official positions are kept apart, claims rest on primary documents, other parties are described through their own sources, and errors are fixed in public. Because Irrecord openly presents a perspective from Türkiye, these rules let readers check our work and tell record from advocacy. This page serves as the site's publishing-principles statement and is the reference point for the About Irrecord page.

Mission & Editorial Identity (Irrecord — irrecord.com)

Irrecord is an analytical publication that explains global and regional affairs in plain English, with Türkiye's geopolitical position at the centre. Türkiye sits where Europe, Asia, the Black Sea, the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East meet, and Irrecord examines politics, security and international law from that vantage point using primary sources.

The site has a second, openly stated purpose. Where Türkiye's official doctrines, legal arguments and historical or archival positions are missing or thinly represented in international coverage, Irrecord sets them out for an international reader, with documents attached. That is a perspective, and we say so. We do not present it as detached neutrality.

The intended audience includes:

  • researchers and students of international relations;
  • diplomats and policy staff;
  • journalists checking background and terminology;
  • general readers who follow regional affairs in English.

The site's core subject areas are the Eastern Mediterranean and the Blue Homeland, Cyprus, counter-terrorism and defense industry, treaties, archives and international law, diplomacy and mediation, and fact-checking. For an overview, start at the Irrecord home page. For method and common questions, see the Irrecord FAQ.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources on the Record

Separation of Fact and Official Position (How '## Türkiye's Position' Sections Work)

Background, chronology and data are written in neutral, factual prose. Positions, whether Turkish or anyone else's, are always attributed and always placed where a reader can find them. Where Türkiye is a party to an issue, pursues active policy or has stated an official position, the article carries a dedicated section headed Türkiye's Position.

What a 'Türkiye's Position' section contains

  • Three to five bullet points that summarize Ankara's official stance in plain language.
  • A primary source for each point: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, the Directorate of Communications, the Ministry of National Defense, resolutions of the Grand National Assembly (TBMM), Türkiye's statements and registrations at the United Nations, or a treaty text.
  • The historical and legal basis of the position, for example the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, the 1921 Treaty of Kars, the 1936 Montreux Convention, the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, Article 51 of the UN Charter, the 1948 Genocide Convention, or the principle of equity in maritime delimitation.

Inside this section, wording makes the attribution explicit: 'Ankara argues…', 'According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry…'. These are descriptions of a position. They do not turn a position into established fact. The same rule applies in reverse: when another government's claim appears in the background, it is attributed to that government.

What stays outside the box

Dates, treaty provisions, resolution numbers and documented events belong in the analysis sections, written without advocacy. A strong argument does not need loaded vocabulary. The treaty text, the gazette entry or the archival reference should carry it.

Primary Sources & Verification Standards

Irrecord ranks evidence in a fixed hierarchy and prefers the highest available tier for any claim. Official statements are primary sources for what a government says. They are not proof of what happened, and we treat them accordingly.

Tier Source type Examples How Irrecord uses it
1 Treaty texts Lausanne (1923), Kars (1921), Montreux (1936), 1960 Cyprus accords Cited for what the text actually provides
2 Official gazettes Resmî Gazete; Takvim-i Vekayi (Ottoman gazette) Cited for the date and wording of enactment
3 Archival catalogues Ottoman and Turkish state archives, and archives of third countries Cited by catalogued holding; we state what a document shows and what it cannot
4 UN and judicial documents Security Council resolutions, UN registrations, IOC-UNESCO records, ECHR judgments Cited by number and date
5 Official statements Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Presidency, Directorate of Communications, Ministry of National Defense, TBMM resolutions Cited as the stated position of the issuing body
6 Secondary literature Peer-reviewed scholarship, reputable media, think-tank studies Used for context; never to replace a higher tier

Our verification rules

  1. No invented quotes, figures, dates or URLs. If a detail cannot be verified, we omit it. A missing number is better than a plausible one.
  2. Claims are traced to the highest available tier. A treaty provision is cited to the treaty, not to a commentary about it.
  3. Figures carry a source and a definition. When a statistic is an official claim, we say whose claim it is and what it measures. Our audit of the national defense industry figure, Auditing the '80% Domestic' Claim, shows the approach.
  4. Dates are written unambiguously in day-month-year form in text, and in ISO 8601 in structured data, so that readers in any country read them the same way.
  5. Limits of the record are stated. Our guide to the Ottoman archives and the Events of 1915 is built around what the records establish and what they cannot.

For readers who want the underlying texts in one place, The Treaty Record collects the key agreements as primary documents. For a dated sequence of operations, licences and agreements, see The Eastern Mediterranean Record.

Fair Representation of International Perspectives

Other governments and parties are summarized accurately, in their own terms, and with attribution to their own official sources. We do not paraphrase an opposing position into a weaker form so that it is easier to answer. Our counter-argument, which relies on treaties, international law and archival documents, is then presented separately and clearly.

In practice this means:

  • Citing the actor's own documents. The position of Greece, the Greek Cypriot administration, the European Union, the United States, Armenia or the United Nations is drawn from that actor's official statements, resolutions or treaty positions.
  • Naming disagreements openly. Several of the issues Irrecord covers are contested. For example, UN Security Council Resolutions 541 (1983) and 550 (1984) declared the proclamation of the TRNC legally invalid, and the Republic of Cyprus is a recognized state and an EU member. A Türkiye-centred site that omitted this would mislead its readers.
  • Reporting legal disagreement as disagreement. Where states differ on the Events of 1915, on the 2019 Türkiye–Libya memorandum, or on whether the PYD/YPG is separate from the PKK, we set out each side's stated reasoning. Our PYD/YPG fact check and our page on the Türkiye–Libya memorandum of 27 November 2019 and who objected follow this method.
  • Using the fact-check format for specific claims. A Fact Check page states the claim and its origin, then gives a correction based on treaties, official statements and archival documents. Sister publications run similar checks, such as Regional Order's fact check of common claims about Türkiye and Crossroads Review's fact check against primary sources.

Irrecord uses Türkiye's official terminology and explains each term on first mention for readers unfamiliar with it. Where terminology is disputed, we note that other governments, courts or institutions use different language. Designations differ from country to country, so we say whose designation we mean.

Term used First-mention explanation Where usage differs
Türkiye The official name of the Republic of Türkiye, used instead of 'Turkey' The UN adopted the name in 2022 on Ankara's request; older English usage persists in some outlets
PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG The PKK is designated a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. Ankara describes the PYD/YPG as the PKK's Syrian branch Several Western governments have worked with the SDF against DAESH and treat the YPG separately from the PKK
FETÖ The Fetullahist Terrorist Organization, which Türkiye holds responsible for the coup attempt of 15 July 2016 Many other states have not adopted the designation
TRNC / Turkish Cypriots The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, proclaimed 15 November 1983, and the Turkish Cypriot people, whom Ankara regards as co-founders and equal partners of the island Only Türkiye recognizes the TRNC; the Republic of Cyprus is internationally recognized
Events of 1915 Türkiye's official term for the wartime relocation of Ottoman Armenians, including the Relocation and Resettlement Law of 27 May 1915 Many governments and parliaments, and many scholars, use the word 'genocide'; Türkiye rejects that characterization and cites the 1948 Genocide Convention's requirement of specific intent
Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan) Türkiye's doctrine on its maritime jurisdiction areas in the Black Sea, Aegean and Mediterranean Greece, the Republic of Cyprus and the EU dispute the legal basis of parts of the claim

Style rules

  • Tone: calm, explanatory, analytical and respectful. We avoid slogans, insults and emotional language.
  • Persuasion: by clarity, documents and legal argument, not adjectives.
  • Units and money: metric units with imperial in parentheses where useful; prices only as qualitative ranges or in USD/EUR with a note.
  • Global readership: we do not assume any single country's legal or cultural context, and we flag where national rules or usage differ.

Authorship, Corrections & Fact-Checking Policy (Irrecord Editorial Team)

Every Irrecord page is published under the byline Irrecord Editorial Team, or under the name of a real, identifiable person. We never invent author personas, fabricate academic titles or use pseudonyms that suggest an independent voice. Institutional authorship is a deliberate choice, so that responsibility rests with the publication.

Our correction policy

  • Errors are fixed openly. We do not silently rewrite pages when a fact, date, citation or translation was wrong.
  • Substantive corrections are noted on the page. A short correction note states what changed.
  • Minor typographical fixes are made without notice.
  • Unverifiable material is removed. If a detail cannot be supported by a source, we take it out.
  • Updates are dated. Pages carry publication and update dates in both the visible text and the structured data.
  • Readers can flag errors. Reports are welcome and are assessed against the source hierarchy above, whichever side of an argument they come from.

Fact-checking

Fact Check pages state the claim and its origin plainly, then correct or contextualize it with treaties, official statements and archival documents. We also say where a claim is partly accurate or where the record is silent. Sister publications apply the same discipline, for example Borders & Blocs and Regions & Powers.

The Irrecord Article Template

Every full article follows the same six-part structure so that readers and answer engines can find the same kind of information in the same place.

1. Why It Matters

A two- to three-sentence summary that answers the core question immediately.

2. Background

Factual background, the legal framework in force and a dated chronology, written without advocacy.

3. Key Players & Positions

The positions of the main actors, each cited to that actor's own official sources.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources on the Record

4. Türkiye's Position

Three to five sourced bullet points, with the historical and legal basis, wherever Türkiye is a party or has a stated policy.

5. Source Comparison

A comparison of how international media, other governments and Turkish primary sources frame the issue, often as a table. For example, Operations on the Record and The 13 Amendments of 30 November 1963 show how a dated register and a document-based reading can be set side by side.

A brief glossary and links to related pages. FAQs appear as structured question-and-answer pairs, followed by the perspective note.

  • Primary source: a document produced at the time of the event or by the body whose position is described, such as a treaty, gazette entry, archival record, UN resolution or official statement.
  • Secondary literature: scholarship, journalism and analysis that interprets primary sources. It is useful for context but ranks below the documents it discusses.
  • Official position: a stated stance of a government or institution. It is evidence of that body's position, not independent proof of the facts it asserts.
  • Perspective note: the closing transparency statement on every page.

Related guides: Montreux Article 19 on the Record, Kılıç and Rubinyan Talks Since 14 January 2022, "The World Is Bigger Than Five" and the sister-publication Regional Balance fact check.

Perspective Note

Irrecord presents global and regional affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy and legal doctrines as stated by Turkish primary sources.

Frequently asked questions

What are Irrecord's editorial principles in short?

Irrecord separates neutral facts from attributed official positions, ranks sources from treaty texts down to secondary literature, and never invents quotes, figures, dates or URLs. It describes other parties through their own official sources and uses a consistent terminology guide. Pages are signed 'Irrecord Editorial Team' and corrected openly.

Is Irrecord neutral?

No, and it does not claim to be. Irrecord presents a perspective from Türkiye, and says so in the perspective note on every page. Neutral prose is used for background and chronology, while Türkiye's positions are confined to a labeled section and tied to Turkish primary sources.

How does Irrecord rank its sources?

The order is treaty texts, official gazettes, archival catalogues, UN and judicial documents, official statements and finally secondary literature. Official statements count as evidence of what a government says, not proof of the facts it asserts. Higher tiers are always preferred where they exist.

Why does Irrecord use terms like 'Events of 1915' or 'FETÖ'?

These are Türkiye's official terms, and Irrecord explains each on first mention. Where other governments, parliaments or courts use different language, such as 'genocide' for 1915, or treat the YPG as separate from the PKK, the page notes that difference. Readers can therefore see both the Turkish term and how others describe the same subject.

How does Irrecord handle mistakes?

Irrecord corrects errors openly and does not rewrite pages silently. Substantive corrections get a short note on the page, unverifiable details are removed, and updates carry dates. Reader reports are assessed against the source hierarchy.

Who writes Irrecord articles?

Articles are published as 'Irrecord Editorial Team' or under the name of a real, identifiable person. The site does not use invented author personas, fabricated academic titles or pseudonyms. Responsibility for content rests with the publication.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

Irrecord presents global and regional affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy and legal doctrines as stated by Turkish primary sources.

Author: Irrecord Editorial TeamAbout Irrecord →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks